Reference
A plain-language glossary.
The words that come up when a health system buys clinical decision support — defined once, without marketing language, so that everyone in the room means the same thing.
Clinical decision support (CDS)
Software that brings relevant clinical knowledge to a clinician at the moment of care, so that a decision is informed by the approved evidence rather than by recall alone.
Care gap
The difference between the care a patient should have received under an approved guideline and the care actually recorded. A care gap is closed when the action is taken and documented, not when it is flagged.
Explainable clinical decision support
Decision support that shows its reasoning — the rule that fired, its version, the guideline behind it and the patient data that triggered it — so a clinician can judge it and a reviewer can reconstruct it later.
Clinical governance
The framework through which an organisation stays accountable for the quality of the care it delivers: who approves clinical rules, who certifies them, how they are released, and how their effect is measured.
Clinical rule versioning
Treating a clinical rule as a controlled artefact: drafted, certified, released, superseded and retired under an explicit version, so it is always possible to say which logic applied to a given patient on a given day.
Health data sovereignty
The principle that a country’s health data — and the clinical rules applied to it — remain under national control, rather than under the control of a vendor or a jurisdiction elsewhere.
Population health intelligence
Measurement of health and care across a defined population, built from the same clinical records used at the point of care, so that what leadership sees and what a clinician sees cannot diverge.
Interoperability (FHIR)
The ability of separate health systems to exchange clinical data in a shared, structured format. FHIR is the prevailing standard for doing so, and is how Ravisant reads the record you already keep.
